I’ve had people tell me that they’ve tried Bing and did not find what they were looking for. Think of it this way: have you ever tried using Bing, not found what you wanted, and then immediately went back to using Google because "Google is better at search"? But then when you use Google and it doesn’t give you the right results, you change your search and try again because you "searched wrong", rather than giving Bing a try? That’s the confirmation bias: if you were truly trying to find out which search engine was better, you’d give them an equal chance to give you right and wrong answers. Regardless of the fact that in some cases Bing still lags behind Google, in pure search results, I can count on one hand in the past two years where Bing has failed me. The point I am trying to make is this, perhaps confirmation bias is the reason why Bing is hated by so many people. Bing) they will only remember the ways in which that service provided a negative experience. That means that when a person has a positive experience with a service they inherently have a negative assumption about (i.e. But if shown the same results labeled as Google, they will interpret them as good. For instance, again, if a person with a "Bing sucks" attitude, arrives at Bing results, they will interpret those results as bad. In this bias a person will make a judgment call on the evidence to support their original hypothesis. For example, if I assume Bing returns bad results, then I would be intentionally looking for all the bad results instead of the good ones. In other words, they tend to look for the evidence they would expect if their hypothesis were true. They test it in such a way that requires an affirmative answer that supports their hypothesis.
In this bias, people hold a hypothesis which they assume to be true. According to the most accurate encyclopedia on the planet (that was a joke), confirmation bias is a "tendency of people to favor information that confirms their hypotheses".Ĭonfirmation bias has to do with how people process information, particularly any way in which people avoid rejecting their assumptions whether they are searching for evidence, interpreting it, or recalling it from memory.
![why does searching on a mac suck why does searching on a mac suck](https://www.barebones.com/images/bbedit/screenshot-main.jpg)
The explanation is found in a psychology concept known as confirmation bias. He goes on to explain why people chose based on brand rather than quality. To the best of our understanding from the outside, this was impartial, data-driven research done by an internal team at SurveyMonkey. We didn’t even know it was happening until after the results were released, and since Google recently became a prominent investor in SurveyMonkey, it would be hard to argue that SurveyMonkey had a pro-Bing bias. Bing wasn’t involved in this study in any way. According to Matt Wallaert of the Bing team:īefore explaining the psychological forces at work here, let me put to rest any concerns of corporate trickery. When you look at both studies an interesting thing appears: more people preferred the Bing results labeled Google than the Google results labeled as Google. More people preferred the Bing results labeled Google. They say see under spotlight reviews? no I don't see spotlight reviews.In another survey 262 participants were given the same results but this time the branding was swapped: Google results labeled Bing and Bing results labeled Google.
![why does searching on a mac suck why does searching on a mac suck](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/H5nwnqO0oNmrMeNQGQs425hmHEo=/0x0:2040x1360/1200x675/filters:focal(857x517:1183x843)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/67798722/vpavic_191118_3800_0189.0.jpg)
In SAfari, it says there are 69 reviews, but no link to any of them! I look and look and then call Amazon.
![why does searching on a mac suck why does searching on a mac suck](https://9to5mac.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2021/09/ios-15-wikipedia.jpg)
This amazon book, a friend says he read reviews on: Still, every month, some fiasco with page that Firefox displays perfectly and this one takes the cake. 2) I like backing up bookmarks with Safari Bookmark exporter, which there is no good equivilant of in Firefoxģ) has organic autofill with Firefox does not.